An extensive explanation on the Moving average convergence and divergence (MACD) and Bollinger Bands. ..
In the late seventies, Gerald Appel developed the Moving Average Convergence and Divergence (MACD) indicator. Traders consider MACD as the grand old daddy of indicators. Though invented in the seventies, MACD is still considered one of the most reliable momentum traders’ indicators.
As the name suggests, MACD is all about the convergence and divergence of the two moving averages. Convergence occurs when the two moving averages move towards each other, and divergence occurs when the moving averages move away.
A standard MACD is calculated using a 12 day EMA and a 26 day EMA. Please note, both the EMA’s are based on the closing prices. We subtract the 26 EMA from the 12 day EMA, to estimate the convergence and divergence (CD) value. A simple line graph of this is often referred to as the ‘MACD Line’. Let us go through the math first and then figure out the applications of MACD.
Date | Close | 12 Day EMA | 26 Day EMA | MACD Line |
---|---|---|---|---|
1-Jan-14 | 6302 | |||
2-Jan-14 | 6221 | |||
3-Jan-14 | 6211 | |||
6-Jan-14 | 6191 | |||
7-Jan-14 | 6162 | |||
8-Jan-14 | 6175 | |||
9-Jan-14 | 6168 | |||
10-Jan-14 | 6171 | |||
13-Jan-14 | 6273 | |||
14-Jan-14 | 6242 | |||
15-Jan-14 | 6321 | |||
16-Jan-14 | 6319 | |||
17-Jan-14 | 6262 | 6230 | ||
20-Jan-14 | 6304 | 6226 | ||
21-Jan-14 | 6314 | 6233 | ||
22-Jan-14 | 6339 | 6242 | ||
23-Jan-14 | 6346 | 6254 | ||
24-Jan-14 | 6267 | 6269 | ||
27-Jan-14 | 6136 | 6277 | ||
28-Jan-14 | 6126 | 6274 | ||
29-Jan-14 | 6120 | 6271 | ||
30-Jan-14 | 6074 | 6258 | ||
31-Jan-14 | 6090 | 6244 | ||
3-Feb-14 | 6002 | 6225 | ||
4-Feb-14 | 6001 | 6198 | ||
5-Feb-14 | 6022 | 6176 | ||
6-Feb-14 | 6036 | 6153 | 6198 | -45 |
7-Feb-14 | 6063 | 6130 | 6188 | -58 |
10-Feb-14 | 6053 | 6107 | 6182 | -75 |
11-Feb-14 | 6063 | 6083 | 6176 | -94 |
12-Feb-14 | 6084 | 6066 | 6171 | -106 |
13-Feb-14 | 6001 | 6061 | 6168 | -107 |
Let us go through the table starting from left:
When we calculate the MACD value over 12 and 26 day EMAs and plot it as a line graph, we get the MACD line, which oscillates above and below the central line.
Date | Close | 12 Day EMA | 26 Day EMA | MACD Line |
---|---|---|---|---|
1-Jan-14 | 6302 | |||
2-Jan-14 | 6221 | |||
3-Jan-14 | 6211 | |||
6-Jan-14 | 6191 | |||
7-Jan-14 | 6162 | |||
8-Jan-14 | 6175 | |||
9-Jan-14 | 6168 | |||
10-Jan-14 | 6171 | |||
13-Jan-14 | 6273 | |||
14-Jan-14 | 6242 | |||
15-Jan-14 | 6321 | |||
16-Jan-14 | 6319 | |||
17-Jan-14 | 6262 | 6230 | ||
20-Jan-14 | 6304 | 6226 | ||
21-Jan-14 | 6314 | 6233 | ||
22-Jan-14 | 6339 | 6242 | ||
23-Jan-14 | 6346 | 6254 | ||
24-Jan-14 | 6267 | 6269 | ||
27-Jan-14 | 6136 | 6277 | ||
28-Jan-14 | 6126 | 6274 | ||
29-Jan-14 | 6120 | 6271 | ||
30-Jan-14 | 6074 | 6258 | ||
31-Jan-14 | 6090 | 6244 | ||
3-Feb-14 | 6002 | 6225 | ||
4-Feb-14 | 6001 | 6198 | ||
5-Feb-14 | 6022 | 6176 | ||
6-Feb-14 | 6036 | 6153 | 6198 | -45 |
7-Feb-14 | 6063 | 6130 | 6188 | -58 |
10-Feb-14 | 6053 | 6107 | 6182 | -75 |
11-Feb-14 | 6063 | 6083 | 6176 | -94 |
12-Feb-14 | 6084 | 6066 | 6171 | -106 |
13-Feb-14 | 6001 | 6061 | 6168 | -107 |
14-Feb-14 | 6048 | 6051 | 6161 | -111 |
17-Feb-14 | 6073 | 6045 | 6157 | -112 |
18-Feb-14 | 6127 | 6045 | 6153 | -108 |
19-Feb-14 | 6153 | 6048 | 6147 | -100 |
20-Feb-14 | 6091 | 6060 | 6144 | -84 |
21-Feb-14 | 6155 | 6068 | 6135 | -67 |
24-Feb-14 | 6186 | 6079 | 6129 | -50 |
25-Feb-14 | 6200 | 6092 | 6126 | -34 |
26-Feb-14 | 6239 | 6103 | 6122 | -19 |
28-Feb-14 | 6277 | 6118 | 6119 | -1 |
3-Mar-14 | 6221 | 6136 | 6117 | 20 |
4-Mar-14 | 6298 | 6148 | 6112 | 36 |
5-Mar-14 | 6329 | 6172 | 6113 | 59 |
6-Mar-14 | 6401 | 6196 | 6121 | 75 |
7-Mar-14 | 6527 | 6223 | 6131 | 92 |
10-Mar-14 | 6537 | 6256 | 6147 | 110 |
11-Mar-14 | 6512 | 6288 | 6165 | 124 |
12-Mar-14 | 6517 | 6324 | 6181 | 143 |
13-Mar-14 | 6493 | 6354 | 6201 | 153 |
14-Mar-14 | 6504 | 6380 | 6220 | 160 |
Given the MACD value, let’s try and find the answer for a few obvious questions:
The sign associated with the MACD just indicates the direction of the stock’s move. For example, if the 12 Day EMA is 6380, and 26 Day EMA is 6220, the MACD value is +160. Under what circumstance do you think the 12 day EMA will be greater than the 26 day EMA? Well, we had looked into this in the moving average chapter. The shorter-term average will generally be higher than the long term only when the stock price trends upward. Remember, the shorter-term average will always be more reactive to the current market price than the long term average. A positive sign tells us that there is positive momentum in the stock, and the stock is drifting upwards. The higher the momentum, the higher is the magnitude. For example, +160 indicate a positive trend which is stronger than +120.
However, while dealing with the magnitude, always remember the price of the stock influences the magnitude. For example, the higher the underlying price such as Bank Nifty, naturally, the higher will be the magnitude of the MACD.
When the MACD is negative, it means the 12 day EMA is lower than the 26 day EMA. Therefore the momentum is negative. Higher the magnitude of the MACD, the more strength in the downward trend.
The difference between the two moving averages is called the MACD spread. The spread decreases when the momentum mellows down and increases when the momentum increases. To visualize convergence and the divergence traders usually plot the MACD value chart, often referred to as the MACD line.
As you can see, the MACD line oscillates over a central zero line. This is also called the ‘Centerline’. The basic interpretation of the MACD indicator is:
Traders generally argue that while waiting for the MACD line to crossover the centerline, a bulk of the movie would already be done and perhaps it would be late to enter a trade. To overcome this, there is an improvisation over this basic MACD line. The improvisation comes in the form of an additional MACD component which is the 9-day signal line. A 9-day signal line is an exponential moving average (EMA) of the MACD line. If you think about this, we now have two lines:
A trader can follow a simple 2 line crossover strategy with these two lines as discussed in the moving averages chapter and no longer wait for the centerline cross over.
The indicator uses standard parameters of MACD:
The chart’s vertical lines highlight the chart’s crossover points where a signal to buy or sell originated.
For example, the first vertical line starting from left points to a crossover where the MACD line lies below the signal line (9 day EMA) lies and suggests a short trade.
The 2nd vertical line from left points to a crossover where the MACD line lies above the signal line should look at buying opportunity. So on and so forth.
Please note, at the core of the MACD system, are moving averages. Hence the MACD indicator has similar properties like that of a moving average system. They work quite well when there is a strong trend and are not too useful when moving sideways. You can notice this between the 1st two-line starting from left.
Needless to say, the MACD parameters are not set in stone. One is free to change the 12 days, and 26 day EMA to whatever time frame one prefers. I personally like to use the MACD in its original form, as introduced by Gerald Appel.
Introduced by John Bollinger in the 1980s, Bollinger Bands (BB) is perhaps one of the most useful technical analysis indicators. BB is used to determine overbought and oversold levels, where a trader will try to sell when the price reaches the top of the band and will execute a buy when the price reaches the bottom of the band.
The BB has 3 components:
The standard deviation (SD) is a statistical concept; which measures a particular variable’s variance from its average. In finance, the standard deviation of the stock price represents the volatility of a stock. For example, if the standard deviation is 12%, it is as good as saying that the stock’s volatility is 12%.
In BB, the standard deviation is applied on the 20 days SMA. The upper band indicates the +2 SD. Using a +2 SD, we multiply the SD by 2 and add it to the average.
For example if the 20 day SMA is 7800, and the SD is 75 (or 0.96%), then the +2 SD would be 7800 + (75*2) = 7950. Likewise, a -2 SD indicates we multiply the SD by 2 and subtract it from the average. 7800 – (2*75) = 7650.
We now have the components of the BB:
Statistically speaking, the current market price should hover around the average price of 7800. However, if the current market price is around 7950, it is considered expensive concerning the average. Hence one should look at shorting opportunities with an expectation that the price will scale back to its average price.
Therefore the trade would be to sell at 7950, with a target of 7800.
Likewise, if the current market price is around 7650, it is considered cheap concerning the average prices. Hence, one should consider buying opportunities to expect that the prices will scale back to its average price.
Therefore the trade would be to buy at 7650, with a target of 7800.
The upper and lower bands act as a trigger to initiate a trade.
The central black line is the 20 day SMA. The two red lines placed above and below the black like are the +2 SD and -2SD. The idea is to short the stock when the price touches the upper band, expecting it to revert to average. Likewise, one can go long when the price touches the lower band, expecting it to revert to the average.
I have highlighted using a down arrow all the sell signals BB generated, while most of the signals worked quite well, there was a phase when the price stuck to the upper band. In fact, the price continued to drift higher, and therefore even the upper band expanded. This is called an envelope expansion.
The BB’s upper and lower band together forms an envelope. The envelope expands, whenever the price drifts in a particular direction, indicating strong momentum. The BB signal fails when there is an envelope expansion. This leads us to an important conclusion; BB works well in sideways markets and fails in a trending market.
Whenever I use BB, I expect the trade to start working in my favour almost immediately. If it does not, I start validating the possibility of an envelope expansion.
There are numerous other technical indicators, and the list is endless. The question is, should you know all these indicators to be a successful trader? The answer is a simple no. Technical indicators are good to know, but they by no means should be your main tool of analysis.
I have personally met many aspiring traders who spend a lot of time and energy learning different indicators, but this is futile in the long run. The working knowledge of a few basic indicators, such as those discussed in this module is sufficient.
In the previous chapters, we started building a checklist that acts as a guiding force behind the trader’s decision to buy or sell. It is time to revisit that checklist.
The indicators act as a tool which the traders can use to confirm their trading decisions, and it is worthwhile to check what the indicators are conveying before placing a buy or a sell order. While the dependence on indicators is not as much S&R, volumes or candlestick patterns, it is always good to know what the basic indicators suggest. For this reason, I would recommend adding indicators in the checklist, but with a twist to it. I will explain the twist in a bit, but before that, let us reproduce the updated checklist.
The sub-bullet points under indicators are where the twist lies.
Now, hypothetically imagine a situation where you are looking at an opportunity to buy shares of Karnataka Bank Limited. On a particular day, Karnataka Bank has formed a bullish hammer, assume everything ticks on the checklist:
With all four checklist points being ticked off I would be happy to buy Karnataka Bank. Hence I place an order to buy, let us say for 500 shares.
However, imagine a situation where the first 3 checklist conditions are met, but the 4th condition (indicators should confirm) is not satisfied. What do you think I should do?
I would still go ahead and buy, but instead of 500 shares, I’d probably buy 300 shares.
This should hopefully convey to you how I tend to (and advocate) the use of indicators.
When Indicators confirm, I increase my bet size, but when Indicators don’t confirm I still go ahead with my decision to buy, I scale down my bet size.
However, I would not do this with the first three checklist points. For example, if the low of the bullish hammer does not coincide in and around the support, I’ll really reconsider my plan to buy the stock; in fact, I may skip the opportunity, and look for another opportunity.
But I do not treat the indicators with the same conviction. It is always good to know what indicators convey, but I don’t base my decisions. If the indicators confirm, I increase the bet size; if they don’t, I still go ahead with my original game plan.
Write a public review